Approximate Query Processing Module
Approximate Query Processing Module
BlinkDB-style approximate query processing for ultra-fast analytics with error bounds.
Overview
This module implements sophisticated approximate query processing inspired by BlinkDB, providing:
- Multi-dimensional Stratified Sampling: Create samples stratified by different column combinations
- Error Bound Computation: Statistical confidence intervals using CLT, Hoeffding’s inequality, and bootstrap methods
- Optimal Sample Selection: Automatically select the best sample for each query based on predicates
- Sample Quality Monitoring: Track sample freshness, coverage, and stratification balance
- BlinkDB Integration: Manage sample families and execute queries with automatic sample selection
Architecture
approximate/├── mod.rs # Core engine and data structures├── blinkdb.rs # BlinkDB-style sample management├── sampling.rs # Stratified sampling algorithms├── error_bounds.rs # Statistical error bound computation└── sample_selection.rs # Optimal sample selection logicKey Concepts
Stratified Sampling
Stratified sampling divides data into homogeneous strata (e.g., by region) and samples from each stratum proportionally. This reduces variance and improves accuracy compared to simple random sampling.
Example:
let sampler = StratifiedSampler::new();let (sample, strata_info) = sampler.create_stratified_sample( &data, &[region_col, category_col], // Stratify by region and category 10.0, // 10% sample size)?;Error Bounds
Error bounds provide confidence intervals for approximate results:
- Wilson Score Interval: For COUNT queries (binomial proportions)
- Central Limit Theorem: For SUM and AVG queries (sample means)
- Hoeffding’s Inequality: Conservative bounds without distribution assumptions
- Bootstrap: Non-parametric confidence intervals
Example:
let calculator = ErrorBoundsCalculator::new();let (lower, upper) = calculator.compute_avg_bounds( &sample_values, 0.95, // 95% confidence);Sample Selection
The sample selector chooses the optimal sample for a query based on:
- Predicate Coverage: Does the sample stratification match query filters?
- Sample Size: Larger samples generally provide better accuracy
- Freshness: Recent samples reflect current data
Scoring Formula:
score = 0.6 * predicate_score + 0.3 * coverage_score + 0.1 * freshness_scoreUsage Examples
Basic Approximate Query
use heliosdb_compute::approximate::*;
// Create enginelet engine = ApproximateEngine::new().await?;
// Create samplelet config = SampleConfig { name: "sales_sample".to_string(), base_table: "sales".to_string(), stratify_columns: vec!["region".to_string()], sample_size_percent: 10.0, target_error_percent: 5.0, filter: None, refresh_interval: None,};engine.create_sample(config).await?;
// Execute approximate COUNT querylet query = ApproximateQuery { sample_name: "sales_sample".to_string(), query: "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sales WHERE region = 'US'".to_string(), confidence_level: 0.95, aggregate_type: Some(AggregateType::Count), aggregate_column: None,};
let result = engine.approx_count(query).await?;
println!("Estimated Count: {:.0}", result.value);println!("Error: ±{:.2}%", result.error_percent);println!("95% CI: [{:.0}, {:.0}]", result.lower_bound, result.upper_bound);BlinkDB Sample Families
let manager = BlinkDBManager::new();
// Create multiple samples with different stratificationslet base_config = SampleConfig { name: "sales_family".to_string(), base_table: "sales".to_string(), stratify_columns: vec![], sample_size_percent: 10.0, target_error_percent: 5.0, filter: None, refresh_interval: None,};
let schemes = vec![ vec!["region".to_string()], vec!["category".to_string()], vec!["region".to_string(), "category".to_string()],];
let sample_names = manager.create_sample_family(base_config, schemes).await?;
// Execute query - BlinkDB selects the best sample automaticallylet query = ApproximateQuery { sample_name: "".to_string(), query: "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sales WHERE region = 'US'".to_string(), confidence_level: 0.95, aggregate_type: Some(AggregateType::Count), aggregate_column: None,};
let result = manager.execute_approximate_query(query).await?;println!("Selected sample: {}", result.selected_sample);Sample Quality Monitoring
let quality = engine.get_sample_quality("sales_sample").await?;
println!("Coverage: {:.2}%", quality.coverage);println!("Freshness: {:.2}s", quality.freshness.as_secs_f64());println!("Estimated Error: {:.2}%", quality.estimated_error);println!("Stratification Balance: {:.2}", quality.stratification_balance);SQL Syntax (Planned)
-- Create sampleCREATE SAMPLE sales_sample ON salesSTRATIFIED BY region, product_categoryWITH SIZE 1% ERROR 5%;
-- Approximate querySELECT region, APPROX_COUNT(*) as count, APPROX_AVG(revenue) as avg_revenueFROM sales_sampleWHERE date >= '2025-01-01'GROUP BY regionWITH CONFIDENCE 95%;
-- Result includes error bounds:-- region | count | count_lower | count_upper | avg_revenue | revenue_error-- US | 1000 | 950 | 1050 | 123.45 | 5.2%Performance Characteristics
| Operation | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Creation | O(n) | O(s) | n = base table size, s = sample size |
| Query Execution | O(s) | O(1) | s = sample size |
| Sample Selection | O(k) | O(1) | k = number of samples |
| Error Computation | O(s) | O(1) | s = sample size |
Speedup Example:
- Base table: 1 billion rows
- Sample (1%): 10 million rows
- Query speedup: ~100x
- Accuracy: ±5% error with 95% confidence
Error Bounds Formulas
COUNT (Wilson Score Interval)
p̂ = sample_count / sample_sizeCI = (p̂ + z²/2n ± z√(p̂(1-p̂)/n + z²/4n²)) / (1 + z²/n)
where z is the z-score for confidence level (e.g., 1.96 for 95%)SUM and AVG (Central Limit Theorem)
SE = σ / √n
CI = x̄ ± z * SE
where: x̄ = sample mean σ = sample standard deviation n = sample size z = z-score for confidence levelHoeffding’s Inequality (Conservative)
P(|x̄ - μ| > ε) ≤ 2 * exp(-2nε²/R²)
Solving for ε given confidence δ:ε = R * √(ln(2/δ) / 2n)
where R is the range of valuesBest Practices
-
Stratification Strategy:
- Stratify by columns frequently used in WHERE clauses
- Use multi-dimensional stratification for complex queries
- Create sample families covering common query patterns
-
Sample Size Selection:
- Larger samples → lower error, higher storage/query cost
- Target: 1-10% for most use cases
- Use
compute_required_sample_size()for error targets
-
Refresh Strategy:
- Refresh samples when base data changes significantly
- Use incremental refresh for large tables
- Monitor sample quality metrics
-
When to Use Approximate Queries:
- Exploratory analytics and dashboards
- Trend analysis and aggregations
- Large datasets where exact results are too slow
- ❌ Regulatory reports requiring exact values
- ❌ Small datasets where exact queries are fast
Testing
The module includes comprehensive tests:
- Unit Tests: 50+ tests covering all components
- Integration Tests: 15+ end-to-end scenarios
- Test Coverage: >80%
Run tests:
cargo test -p heliosdb-compute approximatecargo test -p heliosdb-compute --test approximate_integration_testReferences
- BlinkDB: Queries with Bounded Errors and Bounded Response Times
- Stratified Sampling in Statistics
- Hoeffding’s Inequality
- Central Limit Theorem
Future Enhancements
- Online sample maintenance (incremental updates)
- Adaptive sampling (adjust sample size based on query workload)
- Join support (approximate join results)
- Time-series aware sampling
- GPU-accelerated sampling
- Sample compression