HeliosDB Performance Tuning Guide
HeliosDB Performance Tuning Guide
Document Version: 1.0 Created: November 24, 2025 Last Updated: November 24, 2025 Target Audience: Database Administrators, Performance Engineers, DevOps Applies To: HeliosDB v6.0+, v7.0 (in development)
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Quick Start Performance Checklist
- GPU Acceleration Tuning
- Query Optimization
- Connection Pool Configuration
- Memory Management
- Storage Layer Tuning
- Protocol-Specific Optimization
- Caching Strategies
- Monitoring & Diagnostics
- Capacity Planning
- Troubleshooting Performance Issues
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This guide provides comprehensive instructions for optimizing HeliosDB performance across various workload types: OLTP, OLAP (analytical), and HTAP (hybrid transactional/analytical processing).
1.2 Performance Goals
| Workload Type | Target Metrics |
|---|---|
| OLTP | <1ms P50 latency, <5ms P99 latency, 50K-200K ops/sec |
| Analytical (with GPU) | 10-30x speedup vs CPU, <100ms for 1M row aggregation |
| Analytical (CPU only) | <1s for 1M row aggregation, <10s for complex joins |
| Mixed (HTAP) | OLTP metrics + 5-20x analytical speedup |
1.3 Hardware Assumptions
Minimum Production:
- 16 CPU cores
- 64 GB RAM
- 1 TB NVMe SSD (50K+ IOPS)
- 10 Gbps network
- Optional: 1x GPU (16+ GB VRAM)
Recommended Production:
- 32-64 CPU cores
- 128-256 GB RAM
- 2-10 TB NVMe SSD (100K+ IOPS)
- 25 Gbps network
- 1-2x GPU (24-48 GB VRAM)
2. Quick Start Performance Checklist
2.1 Essential Configuration (First 5 Minutes)
[server]max_connections = 1000worker_threads = 32 # Equal to CPU core count
[memory]total_memory_limit = "128GB"query_memory_limit = "4GB"cache_memory_limit = "32GB"
[storage]data_dir = "/mnt/nvme/heliosdb"wal_dir = "/mnt/nvme/heliosdb/wal"compaction_threads = 4
[gpu]enabled = truedevice_ids = [0] # Use GPU 0min_rows_for_gpu = 100000 # 100K row thresholdApply configuration:
sudo systemctl restart heliosdb# or./heliosdb-server --config config/heliosdb.toml2.2 Verify Performance Baseline
# Run built-in benchmarkheliosdb-cli benchmark --quick
# Expected results:# - OLTP read: 30K-50K ops/sec# - OLTP write: 10K-20K ops/sec# - Analytical (GPU): 5-15x speedup2.3 Common Quick Wins
| Action | Expected Improvement | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Enable GPU acceleration | 5-30x for analytical queries | 5 minutes |
| Increase block cache size | 2-5x random read performance | 5 minutes |
| Tune connection pool | 20-50% connection overhead reduction | 10 minutes |
| Enable query caching | 10-100x for repeated queries | 5 minutes |
| Add appropriate indexes | 10-1000x for filtered queries | 15-60 minutes |
3. GPU Acceleration Tuning
3.1 When to Use GPU
** Use GPU for:**
- Aggregations (SUM, AVG, COUNT, GROUP BY)
- Large joins (>100K rows)
- Table scans with filters
- Window functions
- Vector similarity search
- Large datasets (>100K rows)
❌ Avoid GPU for:
- Point lookups (single row)
- Small queries (<10K rows)
- Sequential operations (ORDER BY without aggregation)
- Transactions (OLTP workload)
- Short queries (<10ms total time)
Reason: GPU has transfer overhead (~1-10ms). Only worthwhile if computation savings exceed transfer cost.
3.2 GPU Configuration
[gpu]# Enable GPU accelerationenabled = true
# GPU device IDs (0-indexed)device_ids = [0, 1] # Use GPUs 0 and 1
# Minimum rows to use GPU (avoid overhead for small queries)min_rows_for_gpu = 100000 # 100K rows (default: 50K)
# GPU memory allocationpool_size = "4GB" # Per-query GPU memory limitcache_size = "2GB" # Intermediate result cachemax_transfer_size = "1GB" # Max single transfer
# Cost model tuningspeedup_threshold = 3.0 # Use GPU if estimated >3x fasterconfidence_threshold = 0.7 # Confidence in cost estimate (0-1)
# Advanced settingsenable_async_transfers = true # Overlap CPU/GPU operationsenable_kernel_fusion = true # Combine multiple operationsenable_auto_tuning = true # Adaptive parameter tuning3.3 Query Hints for GPU
-- Force GPU executionSELECT /*+ USE_GPU */ SUM(price) FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- Force CPU executionSELECT /*+ NO_GPU */ * FROM small_table;
-- Specify GPU deviceSELECT /*+ GPU_DEVICE(1) */ AVG(value) FROM large_table;3.4 GPU Performance Monitoring
-- Check GPU usageSELECT * FROM system.gpu_stats;
-- Expected output:-- device_id | utilization | memory_used | memory_total | queries_executed-- 0 | 78% | 12GB | 24GB | 15234
-- Query-level GPU metricsEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, GPU_STATS)SELECT SUM(value) FROM large_table;
-- Sample output:-- GPU Aggregation: 83ms (12.1x speedup vs CPU)-- Transfer time: 15ms (H2D: 8ms, D2H: 7ms)-- Kernel time: 68ms-- CPU baseline: 1000ms3.5 GPU Troubleshooting
Problem: GPU not being used despite large dataset
Solutions:
- Check
min_rows_for_gputhreshold - Verify cost model prediction:
EXPLAIN (GPU_COST) SELECT ... - Check GPU memory availability:
SELECT * FROM system.gpu_stats - Use query hint to force GPU:
/*+ USE_GPU */
Problem: Slower with GPU than CPU
Causes & Solutions:
- Small dataset: Increase
min_rows_for_gpu - Transfer overhead: Enable
async_transfers, increase batch size - Low GPU utilization: Check for sequential operations, consider CPU
- Memory thrashing: Reduce
pool_size, reduce concurrent GPU queries
4. Query Optimization
4.1 Query Best Practices
4.1.1 Column Pruning
-- ❌ Bad: Select all columnsSELECT * FROM large_table WHERE condition;
-- Good: Select only needed columnsSELECT id, name, price FROM large_table WHERE condition;
-- Impact: 3-10x less data transfer, faster parsing, lower memory4.1.2 Predicate Pushdown
-- ❌ Bad: Filter after joinSELECT * FROM orders oJOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.idWHERE o.date > '2024-01-01';
-- Good: Filter before joinSELECT * FROM orders oWHERE o.date > '2024-01-01'JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id;
-- Impact: 10-100x fewer rows in join, significantly faster4.1.3 Index Usage
-- Create index for frequently filtered columnsCREATE INDEX idx_orders_date ON orders(date);CREATE INDEX idx_orders_customer ON orders(customer_id);
-- Verify index usageEXPLAIN SELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';-- Should show: "Index Scan using idx_orders_date"
-- Composite index for multi-column filtersCREATE INDEX idx_orders_date_status ON orders(date, status);4.1.4 Avoid SELECT *
-- ❌ Bad: Unknown columns, full table scanSELECT * FROM large_table;
-- Good: Explicit columns, optimized executionSELECT id, name, value FROM large_table;4.1.5 Use LIMIT for Testing
-- Testing queries on large tablesSELECT * FROM orders LIMIT 100;
-- Production query without LIMITSELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';4.2 Using EXPLAIN
-- Basic query planEXPLAIN SELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- With execution statisticsEXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- With GPU routing decisionEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, GPU_COST)SELECT SUM(amount) FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- With detailed timingEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, BUFFERS)SELECT o.*, c.nameFROM orders oJOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.idWHERE o.date > '2024-01-01';Interpreting EXPLAIN output:
Query Plan: -> Aggregate (cost=1000..1100 rows=1) GPU: Enabled (estimated 10.5x speedup) -> Seq Scan on orders (cost=0..900 rows=100000) Filter: (date > '2024-01-01') GPU Transfer: 150MB (estimated 15ms) GPU Kernel: 68ms CPU Baseline: 1000ms
Execution Time: 83msKey metrics:
- Cost: Optimizer’s estimate (lower is better)
- Rows: Estimated row count at each stage
- GPU: GPU routing decision and estimates
- Execution Time: Actual query runtime
4.3 Query Optimization Patterns
Pattern 1: Aggregation Optimization
-- ❌ Inefficient: Multiple passesSELECT SUM(amount) as total, AVG(amount) as average, COUNT(*) as countFROM ordersWHERE date > '2024-01-01';
SELECT MAX(amount) FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';SELECT MIN(amount) FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- Efficient: Single passSELECT SUM(amount) as total, AVG(amount) as average, COUNT(*) as count, MAX(amount) as max_amount, MIN(amount) as min_amountFROM ordersWHERE date > '2024-01-01';Pattern 2: Join Optimization
-- ❌ Inefficient: Cartesian productSELECT * FROM orders o, customers cWHERE o.customer_id = c.id;
-- Efficient: Explicit joinSELECT * FROM orders oINNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id;
-- Optimal: Join on indexed columnsCREATE INDEX idx_orders_customer ON orders(customer_id);CREATE INDEX idx_customers_id ON customers(id);
SELECT * FROM orders oINNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id;Pattern 3: Subquery Optimization
-- ❌ Inefficient: Correlated subquerySELECT * FROM orders oWHERE amount > (SELECT AVG(amount) FROM orders WHERE customer_id = o.customer_id);
-- Efficient: Join with aggregationSELECT o.* FROM orders oJOIN ( SELECT customer_id, AVG(amount) as avg_amount FROM orders GROUP BY customer_id) avg_orders ON o.customer_id = avg_orders.customer_idWHERE o.amount > avg_orders.avg_amount;4.4 Query Hints
HeliosDB supports query hints to control optimizer behavior:
-- Force GPU executionSELECT /*+ USE_GPU */ SUM(amount) FROM orders;
-- Force CPU executionSELECT /*+ NO_GPU */ * FROM small_table;
-- Force specific join algorithmSELECT /*+ HASH_JOIN(orders, customers) */ o.*, c.nameFROM orders oJOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id;
-- Force index usageSELECT /*+ INDEX(orders, idx_orders_date) */ * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01';
-- Disable query cacheSELECT /*+ NO_CACHE */ * FROM real_time_table;
-- Set query timeoutSELECT /*+ TIMEOUT(30s) */ * FROM slow_query;5. Connection Pool Configuration
5.1 Connection Pool Sizing
Formula:
connections_per_node = (CPU_cores × 2) to (CPU_cores × 4)Examples:
- 16 cores → 32-64 connections
- 32 cores → 64-128 connections
- 64 cores → 128-256 connections
5.2 Configuration
[server]# Maximum total connectionsmax_connections = 1000
# Connection pool per protocol[protocols.postgres]pool_size = 100min_idle = 10max_idle = 50connection_timeout = "30s"idle_timeout = "600s"max_lifetime = "1h"
[protocols.mongodb]pool_size = 200min_idle = 20max_idle = 100connection_timeout = "30s"idle_timeout = "300s"max_lifetime = "1h"
[protocols.oracle]pool_size = 100min_idle = 10max_idle = 50connection_timeout = "30s"idle_timeout = "600s"max_lifetime = "1h"5.3 Connection Pool Monitoring
-- Check connection pool statsSELECT * FROM system.connection_pools;
-- Expected output:-- protocol | total | active | idle | waiting | avg_wait_time-- postgres | 100 | 45 | 55 | 0 | 2ms-- mongodb | 200 | 120 | 80 | 5 | 15ms-- oracle | 100 | 30 | 70 | 0 | 1ms
-- Identify connection pool bottlenecksSELECT protocol, AVG(wait_time_ms) as avg_waitFROM system.connection_wait_timesWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour'GROUP BY protocolHAVING AVG(wait_time_ms) > 10;5.4 Tuning Guidelines
Symptoms of under-provisioned pool:
- High connection wait times (>10ms)
- “Max connections reached” errors
- High connection queue depth
Solutions:
- Increase
pool_size - Increase
max_connections - Reduce
idle_timeoutto free idle connections faster - Add more nodes (scale horizontally)
Symptoms of over-provisioned pool:
- High idle connection count (>80%)
- Memory pressure from idle connections
- Context switching overhead
Solutions:
- Reduce
pool_size - Reduce
max_idle - Increase
idle_timeoutto keep useful connections
6. Memory Management
6.1 Memory Configuration
[memory]# Total memory limit for HeliosDBtotal_memory_limit = "128GB"
# Per-query memory limitquery_memory_limit = "4GB"
# Result set memory limit (before streaming)result_memory_limit = "2GB"
# Enable streaming for large resultsenable_streaming = true
# Memory pools[memory.pools]query_cache = "8GB"parser_cache = "1GB"block_cache = "32GB"connection_pool = "4GB"gpu_pool = "4GB"
# Memory pressure handling[memory.pressure]enable_monitoring = truewarning_threshold = 0.8 # 80% memory usagecritical_threshold = 0.9 # 90% memory usageoom_kill_queries = true # Kill queries exceeding limits6.2 Cache Configuration
[cache]# Query result cache[cache.query_results]enabled = truesize = "8GB"ttl = "1h"eviction_policy = "LRU"
# Parser cache (AST caching)[cache.parser]enabled = truesize = "1GB"max_entries = 100000ttl = "24h"
# Block cache (storage layer)[cache.blocks]enabled = truesize = "32GB"block_size = "16KB"eviction_policy = "LRU"
# GPU result cache[cache.gpu_results]enabled = truesize = "2GB"ttl = "10m"6.3 Memory Monitoring
-- Overall memory usageSELECT * FROM system.memory_stats;
-- Expected output:-- category | used | limit | percent-- total | 96GB | 128GB | 75%-- query_cache | 6GB | 8GB | 75%-- block_cache | 28GB | 32GB | 87%-- gpu_pool | 3GB | 4GB | 75%-- connections | 2GB | 4GB | 50%
-- Per-query memory usageSELECT query_id, memory_used, execution_time_ms, statusFROM system.active_queriesORDER BY memory_used DESCLIMIT 10;
-- Memory pressure eventsSELECT * FROM system.memory_pressure_eventsWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour';6.4 Memory Optimization Tips
Tip 1: Use streaming for large results
-- Enable streaming for specific querySELECT /*+ STREAMING */ * FROM large_table;
-- Configure streaming thresholdSET streaming_threshold = '100MB';Tip 2: Reduce result set size
-- Use paginationSELECT * FROM orders LIMIT 1000 OFFSET 0;
-- Use column pruningSELECT id, name FROM large_table; -- Not SELECT *Tip 3: Increase block cache for read-heavy workloads
[cache.blocks]size = "64GB" # Increase from default 32GBTip 4: Monitor and kill memory-intensive queries
-- Kill query exceeding memory limitSELECT kill_query('query-id-123');
-- Set memory limit for sessionSET query_memory_limit = '2GB';7. Storage Layer Tuning
7.1 LSM Tree Configuration
[storage]# LSM tree settingscompaction_style = "leveled" # or "universal", "tiered"
# L0 (MemTable flush target)l0_file_num_compaction_trigger = 4 # Trigger compaction at 4 L0 filesl0_slowdown_writes_trigger = 8 # Slow writes at 8 L0 filesl0_stop_writes_trigger = 12 # Stop writes at 12 L0 files
# Compactionmax_background_compactions = 4max_background_flushes = 2compaction_threads = 4
# SSTable settingstarget_file_size_base = "64MB"max_bytes_for_level_base = "256MB"target_file_size_multiplier = 10
# Bloom filtersbloom_filter_bits_per_key = 10 # 1% false positive ratebloom_filter_enabled = true
# Block cacheblock_cache_size = "32GB"block_size = "16KB"cache_index_and_filter_blocks = true7.2 Write-Ahead Log (WAL) Tuning
[storage.wal]# WAL settingswal_dir = "/mnt/nvme/heliosdb/wal"wal_size_limit = "4GB"max_wal_files = 10
# Synchronizationwal_sync_mode = "fsync" # "fsync", "fdatasync", "none"wal_sync_after_write = truewal_group_commit_delay = "1ms" # Batch commits
# Recoverywal_recovery_mode = "point_in_time"wal_archive_enabled = truewal_archive_dir = "/backup/wal"7.3 Compaction Strategies
Leveled Compaction (Default, recommended for most workloads)
- Best for read-heavy workloads
- Low read amplification (1-2 reads per key)
- Higher write amplification (10-30x)
- Predictable performance
Universal Compaction (Write-optimized)
- Best for write-heavy workloads
- Low write amplification (2-5x)
- Higher read amplification (5-10 reads per key)
- Bursty compaction
Tiered Compaction (Time-series optimized)
- Best for time-series data
- Efficient for TTL-based data
- Good for append-only workloads
[storage]# Example: Write-optimized configurationcompaction_style = "universal"max_background_compactions = 8compaction_threads = 87.4 Storage Monitoring
-- Storage statisticsSELECT * FROM system.storage_stats;
-- Expected output:-- metric | value-- total_size | 2.5TB-- data_size | 2.0TB-- index_size | 300GB-- wal_size | 4GB-- compaction_pending | 20GB-- read_amplification | 1.8-- write_amplification | 15.2
-- Compaction statisticsSELECT * FROM system.compaction_stats;
-- LSM tree structureSELECT level, file_count, total_sizeFROM system.lsm_levels;
-- Expected output:-- level | file_count | total_size-- 0 | 3 | 192MB-- 1 | 12 | 768MB-- 2 | 45 | 2.8GB-- 3 | 120 | 12GB7.5 Storage Optimization Tips
Tip 1: Tune compaction for workload
- Read-heavy: Leveled compaction, aggressive compaction
- Write-heavy: Universal compaction, delayed compaction
- Time-series: Tiered compaction, TTL-based cleanup
Tip 2: Use appropriate bloom filter settings
# More memory, fewer false positivesbloom_filter_bits_per_key = 15 # 0.1% FPR (vs 1% default)
# Less memory, more false positivesbloom_filter_bits_per_key = 5 # 10% FPRTip 3: Optimize for SSD
[storage]use_direct_io = trueuse_mmap_reads = falseallow_os_buffer = falseTip 4: Separate WAL and data on different disks
[storage]data_dir = "/mnt/nvme0/heliosdb" # Fast SSD for datawal_dir = "/mnt/nvme1/heliosdb/wal" # Separate SSD for WAL8. Protocol-Specific Optimization
8.1 PostgreSQL Wire Protocol
[protocols.postgres]# Connection settingsmax_connections = 1000pool_size = 100connection_timeout = "30s"
# Protocol optimizationenable_binary_format = true # Binary encoding (faster)enable_prepared_statements = truestatement_cache_size = 10000
# Result formatdefault_format = "binary" # "text" or "binary"enable_compression = truecompression_threshold = "1MB"
# Performanceenable_pipeline_mode = true # Batch multiple queriesmax_batch_size = 100Best practices:
- Use prepared statements for repeated queries
- Enable binary format for large result sets
- Use connection pooling (PgBouncer, Pgpool)
- Batch inserts using COPY or multi-value INSERT
-- ❌ Inefficient: Multiple individual insertsINSERT INTO orders VALUES (1, 'Alice', 100);INSERT INTO orders VALUES (2, 'Bob', 200);-- ... 10,000 more
-- Efficient: Batch insertINSERT INTO orders VALUES (1, 'Alice', 100), (2, 'Bob', 200), -- ... up to 1000 rows per batch (1000, 'Zoe', 150);
-- Optimal: COPY for bulk loadingCOPY orders FROM '/data/orders.csv' WITH (FORMAT CSV, HEADER);8.2 MongoDB Wire Protocol
[protocols.mongodb]# Connection settingsmax_connections = 2000pool_size = 200connection_timeout = "30s"
# BSON optimizationenable_bson_cache = truebson_cache_size = "2GB"enable_zero_copy_bson = true # Avoid allocations
# Aggregation pipelineenable_pipeline_optimization = truemax_pipeline_stages = 100
# Performanceenable_cursor_batching = truedefault_batch_size = 1000max_batch_size = 10000Best practices:
- Use projection to limit returned fields
- Use indexes for filter conditions
- Optimize aggregation pipelines (push filters early)
- Use bulk operations for inserts/updates
// ❌ Inefficient: No projectiondb.orders.find({status: "shipped"})
// Efficient: With projectiondb.orders.find( {status: "shipped"}, {_id: 1, customer: 1, total: 1})
// ❌ Inefficient: Aggregation without early filteringdb.orders.aggregate([ {$group: {_id: "$customer", total: {$sum: "$amount"}}}, {$match: {total: {$gt: 1000}}}])
// Efficient: Filter earlydb.orders.aggregate([ {$match: {status: "completed"}}, // Filter first {$group: {_id: "$customer", total: {$sum: "$amount"}}}, {$match: {total: {$gt: 1000}}}])8.3 Oracle TNS Protocol
[protocols.oracle]# Connection settingsmax_connections = 1000pool_size = 100connection_timeout = "30s"
# Protocol optimizationenable_array_fetch = truearray_fetch_size = 1000enable_prefetch = trueprefetch_rows = 100
# Oracle 23ai featuresenable_property_graphs = trueenable_vector_search = trueenable_json_table = true
# Performanceenable_statement_cache = truestatement_cache_size = 5000Best practices:
- Use bind variables (not string concatenation)
- Enable array fetch for bulk operations
- Use Oracle 23ai vector search for similarity queries
- Leverage property graphs for graph analytics
-- ❌ Inefficient: No bind variables (SQL injection risk + no cache)SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 'C123';
-- Efficient: With bind variablesSELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = :customer_id;
-- Oracle 23ai: Vector similarity searchSELECT * FROM productsWHERE VECTOR_DISTANCE(embedding, :query_vector, COSINE) < 0.2ORDER BY VECTOR_DISTANCE(embedding, :query_vector, COSINE)LIMIT 10;9. Caching Strategies
9.1 Multi-Level Cache Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐│ Application Layer │└─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐│ L1: Query Result Cache (8GB) │ <-- Fastest (LRU, 1h TTL)│ - Exact match cache ││ - Full query result caching │└─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐│ L2: Parser Cache (1GB) │ <-- Fast (24h TTL)│ - AST caching ││ - Parameterized query matching │└─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐│ L3: Block Cache (32GB) │ <-- Storage layer│ - SSTable block caching ││ - Index block caching │└─────────────────────────────────────────┘9.2 Query Result Caching
[cache.query_results]enabled = truesize = "8GB"ttl = "1h"eviction_policy = "LRU"
# Cache key strategycache_key_mode = "query_text" # or "query_hash", "semantic_hash"
# Cache invalidationinvalidate_on_write = trueinvalidate_on_schema_change = true
# Statisticsenable_hit_rate_tracking = trueUsing query cache:
-- Automatic caching (default)SELECT * FROM orders WHERE status = 'shipped';
-- Disable cache for specific querySELECT /*+ NO_CACHE */ * FROM real_time_orders;
-- Force cache refreshSELECT /*+ REFRESH_CACHE */ * FROM orders WHERE status = 'shipped';
-- Check cache statisticsSELECT * FROM system.query_cache_stats;-- Expected output:-- metric | value-- size_bytes | 6.2GB-- entries | 125,432-- hit_rate | 78%-- evictions | 10,2349.3 Parser Cache
[cache.parser]enabled = truesize = "1GB"max_entries = 100000ttl = "24h"
# Parameterized query matchingenable_parameterization = trueparameter_threshold = 3 # Cache if query has 3+ literalsBenefits:
- 50-70% faster parsing for repeated query patterns
- Reduced GC pressure (fewer AST allocations)
- Automatic for all queries
9.4 Cache Monitoring
-- Overall cache statisticsSELECT * FROM system.cache_stats;
-- Per-cache hit ratesSELECT cache_name, hit_rate, size_bytes, entriesFROM system.cache_details;
-- Expected output:-- cache_name | hit_rate | size_bytes | entries-- query_results | 78% | 6.2GB | 125,432-- parser | 85% | 850MB | 95,123-- blocks | 92% | 29.5GB | 1,894,234
-- Cache evictions (high evictions = cache too small)SELECT cache_name, evictions_per_minuteFROM system.cache_eviction_rateWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour';10. Monitoring & Diagnostics
10.1 Key Performance Metrics
-- Overall system healthSELECT * FROM system.health_check;
-- Query performance metricsSELECT AVG(execution_time_ms) as avg_latency, PERCENTILE_CONT(0.50) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY execution_time_ms) as p50, PERCENTILE_CONT(0.95) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY execution_time_ms) as p95, PERCENTILE_CONT(0.99) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY execution_time_ms) as p99FROM system.query_logWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour';
-- Throughput metricsSELECT COUNT(*) / 3600.0 as qpsFROM system.query_logWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour';
-- Resource utilizationSELECT * FROM system.resource_stats;-- Expected output:-- resource | current | average | peak-- cpu_percent | 45% | 50% | 85%-- memory_used | 96GB | 90GB | 110GB-- gpu_util | 78% | 65% | 95%-- disk_iops | 12,500 | 15,000 | 45,00010.2 Slow Query Log
[monitoring]# Slow query loggingslow_query_threshold = "100ms"slow_query_log_file = "/var/log/heliosdb/slow-queries.log"enable_slow_query_log = true
# Query samplingquery_sample_rate = 0.1 # Log 10% of queries-- View slow queriesSELECT query_text, execution_time_ms, rows_examined, timestampFROM system.slow_query_logORDER BY execution_time_ms DESCLIMIT 10;
-- Identify frequently slow queriesSELECT query_pattern, COUNT(*) as count, AVG(execution_time_ms) as avg_timeFROM system.slow_query_logWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '24 hours'GROUP BY query_patternORDER BY count DESCLIMIT 10;10.3 Monitoring Tools Integration
Prometheus:
[monitoring.prometheus]enabled = trueport = 9090metrics_path = "/metrics"Grafana Dashboard:
- Import HeliosDB dashboard template
- Visualize QPS, latency, resource usage
- Alert on performance degradation
OpenTelemetry:
[monitoring.opentelemetry]enabled = trueendpoint = "http://otel-collector:4317"sampling_rate = 0.111. Capacity Planning
11.1 Resource Estimation
OLTP Workload:
QPS Target: 50,000 queries/sec
Required:- CPU: 32-64 cores- Memory: 64-128 GB- IOPS: 50K-100K- Network: 10 Gbps- Nodes: 4-8 (with replication)
Cost: ~$20K-$40K/month (cloud)Analytical Workload:
Dataset: 10 TBQuery throughput: 100 queries/hour
Required:- CPU: 64-128 cores- Memory: 256-512 GB- GPU: 2-4x (48-96 GB VRAM)- Storage: 20 TB NVMe- Network: 25-100 Gbps- Nodes: 8-16
Cost: ~$60K-$120K/month (cloud)11.2 Scaling Decision Matrix
| Scenario | Vertical Scale | Horizontal Scale | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU bottleneck | Up to 64 cores | Add nodes | Recommended |
| Memory pressure | Up to 512GB | ❌ Not effective | Add memory + nodes |
| I/O bottleneck | Faster SSD | Shard data | Recommended |
| Network saturation | ❌ Limited gains | Add nodes | Recommended |
| Query concurrency | ❌ Diminishing returns | Linear scaling | Recommended |
11.3 Growth Planning
Capacity headroom:
- Plan for 50-100% headroom on peak load
- Monitor weekly growth trends
- Scale before reaching 70% capacity
Example growth projection:
Current: 10 TB data, 20K QPSGrowth: 20% per quarter
Quarter 1: 12 TB, 24K QPS → No scaling neededQuarter 2: 14.4 TB, 28.8K QPS → Add 2 nodesQuarter 3: 17.3 TB, 34.6K QPS → Add 2 nodesQuarter 4: 20.7 TB, 41.5K QPS → Add 2 nodes + storage12. Troubleshooting Performance Issues
12.1 High Latency
Symptoms:
- Queries taking longer than expected
- Increased P95/P99 latency
- User complaints about slowness
Diagnosis:
-- Check for slow queriesSELECT * FROM system.slow_query_logWHERE execution_time_ms > 1000ORDER BY timestamp DESC LIMIT 20;
-- Check for resource contentionSELECT * FROM system.resource_stats;
-- Check for lock contentionSELECT * FROM system.lock_wait_eventsWHERE wait_time_ms > 100;
-- Check cache hit ratesSELECT * FROM system.cache_stats;Common causes & solutions:
| Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Missing indexes | Run EXPLAIN, add appropriate indexes |
| Cache cold start | Warm cache with common queries |
| Disk I/O saturation | Add faster storage, increase cache |
| CPU bottleneck | Scale up cores or scale out nodes |
| Network congestion | Upgrade network, reduce result size |
| Large result sets | Enable streaming, use pagination |
12.2 Low Throughput
Symptoms:
- QPS below expected
- High connection wait times
- Request queue buildup
Diagnosis:
-- Check connection pool statusSELECT * FROM system.connection_pools;
-- Check for bottlenecksSELECT * FROM system.bottleneck_analysis;
-- Check query distributionSELECT query_type, COUNT(*) as count, AVG(execution_time_ms) as avg_timeFROM system.query_logWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour'GROUP BY query_type;Common causes & solutions:
| Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Connection pool exhausted | Increase pool size |
| Single-threaded bottleneck | Enable parallel execution |
| Lock contention | Optimize transaction scope |
| Compaction storms | Tune compaction thresholds |
| GC pauses | Tune memory allocation |
12.3 High Memory Usage
Symptoms:
- OOM errors
- Memory pressure events
- Killed queries
Diagnosis:
-- Check memory usage breakdownSELECT * FROM system.memory_stats;
-- Identify memory-intensive queriesSELECT query_id, query_text, memory_used_mbFROM system.active_queriesORDER BY memory_used_mb DESC LIMIT 10;
-- Check for memory leaksSELECT * FROM system.memory_leak_detection;Solutions:
- Increase
total_memory_limit - Reduce
query_memory_limit - Enable streaming for large results
- Kill memory-intensive queries
- Reduce cache sizes
12.4 GPU Not Utilized
Symptoms:
- GPU utilization low (<20%)
- Queries not using GPU despite large datasets
- No performance improvement with GPU
Diagnosis:
-- Check GPU statusSELECT * FROM system.gpu_stats;
-- Check GPU routing decisionsEXPLAIN (ANALYZE, GPU_COST) SELECT ...;
-- Check cost model predictionsSELECT * FROM system.gpu_routing_logWHERE timestamp > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour';Common causes & solutions:
| Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Queries too small | Reduce min_rows_for_gpu |
| GPU memory full | Increase GPU memory, reduce concurrent queries |
| Cost model miscalibrated | Retrain cost model, adjust thresholds |
| CUDA errors | Check CUDA installation, driver version |
| Sequential operations | Use query hints to force GPU |
Summary
This guide covers the essential aspects of HeliosDB performance tuning:
- Quick Start: Essential configuration for immediate performance gains
- GPU Acceleration: Maximize analytical query performance with GPU
- Query Optimization: Best practices for efficient query writing
- Connection Pooling: Optimal connection management
- Memory Management: Efficient memory usage and caching
- Storage Tuning: LSM tree and compaction optimization
- Protocol Optimization: Protocol-specific best practices
- Caching: Multi-level cache strategies
- Monitoring: Track performance metrics and identify issues
- Capacity Planning: Resource estimation and scaling strategies
- Troubleshooting: Common performance issues and solutions
Key Takeaways:
- Start with quick wins (GPU, caching, indexes)
- Monitor continuously and adjust based on workload
- Profile before optimizing (measure, don’t guess)
- Scale horizontally for sustained growth
- Use appropriate tools for different workload types
Next Steps:
- Apply quick start configuration
- Run baseline benchmarks
- Monitor key metrics (latency, throughput, resource usage)
- Iterate on optimization based on observed bottlenecks
- Plan capacity growth proactively
For additional support, consult:
Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: November 24, 2025 Feedback: performance@heliosdb.dev